Past Topics

November 2018: Evaluating Early Literacy Programs

This month we’re looking into the Policy and Practice category. The article we selected investigates how one library system evaluated their Mother Goose program.

Article

Graham, Scott and Andre Gagnon. “A Quasi-experimental Evaluation of an Early Literacy Program at the Regina Public Library.” Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences. Jun 2013, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p103-121. Download article here.

Discussion Group Meeting

Sunday, November 4th from 5:30 – 7:30 pm. The Vancouver group will be meeting at the Athlete’s Village Housing Co-op Common Room located at 151 W 1st Ave. Please email us for more details.

Discussion Questions

Here are some suggested discussion questions to think about when reading through the pieces.

Critical Appraisal:

  • What were the key objectives of the article? Are the objectives relevant to libraries?
  • What conclusions did the authors come to and were they just?
  • What were the strengths/weaknesses of the piece? (I.e. Was there bias? Did they use credible sources? Were their data gathering methods sound?)

Current Practice:

  • Does your library run a similar type of early literacy program? How often do you evaluate this program?
  • What methods has your library used to evaluate early literacy programs? Compare and contrast to the method presented in this article.
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the evaluation method the article discusses? Are there other questions we can ask that help us focus our purpose for evaluation?

Can’t Make It To the Meeting?

There’s lots of ways to get involved! Participate online: share your thoughts on social media using the hashtag #lscjournalclub. Find a local group or try hosting a journal club meeting in your local community. Let us know about it so we can spread the word. If you set up a local group, test your presentation skills by leading the discussion.

Leave a comment here with any questions or your thoughts about the articles.

Reflection Pieces

June 2018: Co-Designing the Library

This month we’re looking into the Community Engagement category. The articles look at how libraries are working with community members to plan and design their spaces, as well as investigating barriers community members face to accessing the library fully.

Articles

Miettinen, Virve. “Redefining the Library: Co-Designing for Our Future Selves and Cities.” Public Library Quarterly. 2018, Vol. 37, No. 1, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2017.1379348. Download article here.

Pateman, John. “Developing Community-Led Systems.” Community -Led Work in Practice: Experiences from Canadian libraries. pg. 1-2. Download article here.

Discussion Group Meeting

Sunday, June 10th from 5:30 – 7:30 pm. The Vancouver group will be meeting at the Athlete’s Village Housing Co-op Common Room located at 151 W 1st Ave. Please email us for more details.

Discussion Questions

Here are some suggested discussion questions to think about when reading through the pieces.

Critical Appraisal:

  • What were the key objectives of the article? Are the objectives relevant to libraries?
  • What conclusions did the authors come to and were they just?
  • What were the strengths/weaknesses of the piece? (I.e. Was there bias? Did they use credible sources? Were their data gathering methods sound?)

Current Practice:

  • What kind of organizational and cultural changes would your library have to undertake to implement this model?
  • What skills and qualities do we as library staff need to do community-led work?
  • What barriers to access do your community members face? How can the library help alleviate these barriers?

Can’t Make It To the Meeting?

There’s lots of ways to get involved! Participate online: share your thoughts on social media using the hashtag #lscjournalclub. Find a local group or try hosting a journal club meeting in your local community. Let us know about it so we can spread the word. If you set up a local group, test your presentation skills by leading the discussion.

Leave a comment here with any questions or your thoughts about the articles.

Reflection Pieces

April 2018: Play and the Learning Environment

This month we’re looking into the Library as Place category. The articles look at how we can design learning environments that are conducive to play.

Articles

Feinberg, Sandra. (2010). Designing Space for Children and Teens in Libraries and Public Places. Chapter 10: Play and the Learning Environment. pages 256 – 285. Available here: https://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/53567_ch_10.pdf

Carly DauchMichelle ImwalleBrooke Ocasio, and Alexia E.Metz. The influence of the number of toys in the environment on toddlers’ play. Infant Behavior and Development. Volume 50, February 2018, Pages 78-87. Available here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638317301613?via%3Dihub

Discussion Group Meeting

Sunday, April 8th from 5:30 – 7:30 pm. The Vancouver group will be meeting at the Athlete’s Village Housing Co-op Common Room located at 151 W 1st Ave. Please email us for more details.

Discussion Questions

Here are some suggested discussion questions to think about when reading through the pieces.

Critical Appraisal:

  • What were the key objectives of the article? Are the objectives relevant to libraries?
  • What conclusions did the authors come to and were they just?
  • What were the strengths/weaknesses of the piece? (I.e. Was there bias? Did they use credible sources? Were their data gathering methods sound?)

Current Practice:

  • How can we design our library spaces to foster play?  Are there other ways we can foster play outside of the physical library space?
  • How might play look for different ages?
  • How do we use toys in the library?  How do we select toys to be used in the library?  How does the amount we provide compare with the amount suggested in the article?

Can’t Make It To the Meeting?

There’s lots of ways to get involved! Participate online: share your thoughts on social media using the hashtag #lscjournalclub. Find a local group or try hosting a journal club meeting in your local community. Let us know about it so we can spread the word. If you set up a local group, test your presentation skills by leading the discussion.

Leave a comment here with any questions or your thoughts about the articles.

Reflection Pieces

January 2018: Evaluating “Educational” Apps

This month we’re looking into the STEAM category of technology. The article explores different criteria we can use to evaluate apps as “educational” using the Science of Learning research.

Article

Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy and Jennifer M. Zosh, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff, James H. Gray, Michael B. Robb, and Jordy Kaufman. (2015). Putting Education in “Educational” Apps: Lessons From the Science of Learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol. 16(1) 3-34. Retrieved from: http://kathyhirshpasek.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Psychological-Science-in-the-Public-Interest-2015-Hirsh-Pasek-3-34.pdf

Discussion Group Meeting

Sunday, January 21st at 5:30 pm. Please email us for the Vancouver specific location.

Discussion Questions

Here are some suggested discussion questions to think about when reading through the pieces.

Critical Appraisal:

  • What were the key objectives of the article? Are the objectives relevant to libraries?
  • What conclusions did the authors come to and were they just?
  • What were the strengths/weaknesses of the piece? (I.e. Was there bias? Did they use credible sources? Were their data gathering methods sound?)

Current Practice:

  • How might we share this information with families in a library setting?
  • How does your library support you as a media mentor to families? What can be done to strengthen this role?
  • How do the “four pillars of learning” apply to other things we do in the library such as programming for kids?
  • What are the risks and benefits of applying this knowledge in our work with children and families?

Can’t Make It To the Meeting?

There’s lots of ways to get involved! Participate online: share your thoughts on social media using the hashtag #lscjournalclub. Find a local group or try hosting a journal club meeting in your local community. Let us know about it so we can spread the word. If you set up a local group, test your presentation skills by leading the discussion.

Leave a comment here with any questions or your thoughts about the articles.

Reflection Pieces

Read what others have to say about this month’s readings.

November 2017: Executive Function

For our first discussion we’re delving into the theme of child development with a look at the role of executive function in early childhood.

Articles

Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University (2011). Building the Brain’s “Air Traffic Control” System: How Early Experiences Shape the Development of Executive Function: Working Paper No. 11. Retrieved from https://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/building-the-brains-air-traffic-control-system-how-early-experiences-shape-the-development-of-executive-function/

Hot and Cool Executive Function: Foundations for Learning and Healthy Development. Meuwissen, Alyssa S. and Philip David Zelazo. Zero to Three Journal. November 2014 (Vol 35, No 2). Download here.

Discussion Group Meeting

Sunday, November 5th at 5:30 pm. Please email us for the Vancouver specific location.

Discussion Questions

Here are some suggested discussion questions to think about when reading through the pieces.

Critical Appraisal:

  • What were the key objectives of each article? Was their objective relevant to libraries?
  • What conclusions did the authors come to and were they just?
  • What were the strengths/weaknesses of the pieces? (I.e. Was there bias? Did they use credible sources? Were their data gathering methods sound?)

Current Practice:

  • Do the articles have value to us in our work with children and families at the library? (I.e. Is the information meaningful and/or applicable?)
  • How might the articles’ information on executive function influence future library practice?
  • What are the risks and benefits of applying this knowledge in our work with children and families?

Can’t Make It To the Meeting?

There’s lots of ways to get involved! Participate online: share your thoughts on social media using the hashtag #lscjournalclub. Or try hosting a journal club meeting in your local community. Let us know about it so we can spread the word. If you set up a local group, test your presentation skills by leading the discussion.

Leave a comment here with any questions or your thoughts about the articles.

Reflection Pieces

Read what others have to say about this month’s readings.